On Mar 20, 2:24 pm, Mark Janssen <dreamingforw...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yes, that's the point I'm making, and it's significant because other > programmers can't see other's mental models.
How does having API-less magic objects make this any better? I pass a string message to your RSS object: does it create XML from it? does it parse it as RSS XML and return a mapping? Or do I have to read its code and/or documentation - like I currently do with the classes other developers create - and gain an understanding from that? How about backing up some of your claims of this brave new programming future with actual examples and evidence? Or would you prefer we listen to your gut feeling and ignore concrete research, as you recently recommended to Jane McGonigal? If that's the case, I believe there's a Python4K project which would benefit greatly from your "radical" ideas. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list