On Sat, 20 Apr 2013, Chris “Kwpolska” Warrick wrote:
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 9:42 PM, Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
The OP asked for a string, and I thought you were proposing the string
'null'. If one is to use a string, then 'NaN' makes the most sense,
since it can be converted back into a floating point NaN object.
I infer that you were proposing a JSON null value and not the string
'null'?
Not me, Wayne Werner proposed to use the JSON null value. I parsed
the backticks (`) used by him as a way to delimit it from text and not
as a string.
That was, in fact, my intention. Though it seems to me that you'll have to
suffer between some sort of ambiguity - in Chrome, at least,
`Number(null)` evaluates to `0` instead of NaN. But `Number('Whatever')`
evaluates to NaN. However, a JSON parser obviously wouldn't be able to
make the semantic distinction, so I think you'll be left with whichever
API makes the most sense to you:
NaN maps to null
or
NaN maps to "NaN" (or any other string, really)
Obviously you're not limited to these particular choices, but they're
probably the easiest to implement and communicate.
HTH,
-W
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
