Chris Angelico於 2013年5月7日星期二UTC+8下午9時32分55秒寫道: > On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 11:22 PM, jmfauth <wxjmfa...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > There are plenty of good reasons to use Python. There are > > > also plenty of good reasons to not use (or now to drop) > > > Python and to realize that if you wish to process text > > > seriously, you are better served by using "corporate > > > products" or tools using Unicode properly. > > > > There are plenty of good reasons to use Python. One of them is the > > laughs you can get any time jmf posts here. There are also plenty of > > good reasons to drop Python. One of them is because corporate products > > like Microsoft Visual Studio are inherently better specifically > > because they cost you money, and there's no way that something you > > paid nothing for can ever be as good as that. Plus, you get to write > People used MS products because most bosses did not want to pay the prices of work stations, the minis, or the main-frames and the salaries of the system administrators in 199x.
> code that works on only one platform, and that's really good. Finally, > > moving off Python would mean you don't feel obliged to respond to jmf, > > which will increase your productivity measurably. > > > > ChrisA The price issue of a software package or a platform is not the only way to judge a programming language. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list