On 13May2013 21:41, Dave Angel <[email protected]> wrote: | On 05/13/2013 07:30 PM, Cameron Simpson wrote: | >On 13May2013 19:22, Dave Angel <[email protected]> wrote: | >| On 05/13/2013 06:53 PM, Mark Lawrence wrote: | >| >I much prefer the alternative <> for != but some silly people insisted | >| >that this be removed from Python3. Just how stupid can you get? | >| | >| So which special methods should the <> operator call? By rights it | >| ought to call both __gt__ and __lt__ and return True if either of | >| them is True. | > | >Surely it should require both of them to be true... | | Then it would never be true. At least not for numbers.
Well that was the point. The _symbol_ looks like it should want both. Next time I'll include the smiley. Cheers, -- Cameron Simpson <[email protected]> I really don't like :-) symbols as well. I feel that if you can't see the pie coming, you deserve whipped cream up your nose. - [email protected] (rob derrick) -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
