On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 10:25 PM, Russ P. <russ.paie...@gmail.com> wrote: > I recall reading a few years ago that Guido was thinking about adding > optional type annotations. I don't know if that went anywhere or not, but I > thought it was a good idea. Eventually I got tired of waiting, and I realized > that I just wanted a statically typed language, so I started using one.
Python 3 has support for arbitrary function argument annotations. The language itself ascribes no special meaning to it, so it's up to the user to add a type-checker (or whatever else they might want to use it for). -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
