On Jun 11, 10:37 pm, Chris Angelico <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 3:23 AM, rusi <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Jun 11, 10:05 pm, Fábio Santos <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 11 Jun 2013 17:47, "rusi" <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> > [Of course I would prefer a 3-liner where the body of the for is > >> > indented :-) ] > > >> Is this an aside comprehension? > > > Eh? > > I know they always say "don't explain the joke", but I'll have a shot > at it. It's somewhat like an autopsy though - you find out why it > ticks, but in the process, you prove that it's no longer ticking...
Ok :-) Missed that my aside looked like a comprehension. Or rather did not comprehend! -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
