On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 4:06 PM, John Ladasky <john_lada...@sbcglobal.net> wrote: > On Wednesday, June 12, 2013 8:34:15 PM UTC, Chris Angelico wrote: >>Unless you have a good reason for sticking with 2.x, go with 3.x. > > I agree, Chris, I will be teaching my son Python 3 from the start. In fact, > I'm in the middle of a messy upgrade of my own computer to get everything > ready for Python 3. Upgrading my son's machine should be less painful, > because he doesn't need cutting-edge versions of scipy, wxPython or > Matplotlib... but I do hope that some of the game packages, like PyGame, are > Python 3-compatible. I haven't checked into that yet.
I've used pygame with Python 3, so it's definitely compatible. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
