On Thursday, June 20, 2013 12:45:27 PM UTC+2, Antoon Pardon wrote: > Op 19-06-13 18:14, russ.po...@gmail.com schreef: > > > > > >>>> all(map(lambda x: bool(x), xrange(10**9))) > > > > Since you already have your answer, I just like to get your attention > > to the fact the the lambda is superfluous here. Your expression > > above is equivallent to > > > > all(map(bool, xrange(10**9)))
That's true, I didn't notice that. Although it was a trivial example I was setting up from the actual code and couldn't think of what to shove inside lambda so bool got the short straw. The latest example I showed was actually. >>> all(map(lambda x: n%x, xrange(2, n))) -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
