On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 9:24 AM,  <pablobarhamal...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi there Chris.
> Unfortunately, using iterations was about twice as slow as the original 
> implementation, so that's not the solution.
> Thank's anyway.

Fascinating! Well, was worth a try anyhow. But that's a very surprising result.

ChrisA
-- 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Reply via email to