> Thank you! What tool do you use for coverage? coverage. :-)
> And have you used pychecker? Yes, in fact, I used to use a wrapper script I wrote that ran both pylint and pychecker, then massaged the output into suitable-for-emacs-next-error-command > I heard it is as good as pylint. What do you think? They overlap a fair bit, but do somewhat different things. S -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
