On 2013-08-08 22:32, Joshua Landau wrote: > On 8 August 2013 21:03, Terry Reedy <tjre...@udel.edu> wrote: > > If .pop were being added today, I would argue against including > > the index parameter. > > 3) There's always deque for deques
Unless you have pre-2.4 code, in which case I'm glad .pop() was included (but in this hypothetical world, we'd have a deque in pre-2.4 too :-D -tkc -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
