On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 1:55 PM, <random...@fastmail.us> wrote: > I think, though, that if there's any useful information that can be > obtained by reading accepted PEPs but not the documentation, or if > things are explained less clearly than in the PEPs, that's a bug in the > documentation, and should be remedied by adding to the documentation.
Personally, the only PEPs I've used as reference material as PEP 8 (the Python Style Guide), and PEP 249 (the Python Database API Specification v2.0). If I recall correctly, one of the database adapters I used basically said that they were PEP 249 compliant, and didn't have much documentation beyond that. It seems to me that adding the PEPs to the compiled documentation would be a good thing. They are at least as useful as the Language Reference or the Embedding and Extending Python sections that are already included. -- Jerry -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
