* Nobody <nob...@nowhere.com> [130830 06:55]:
> On Thu, 29 Aug 2013 17:00:21 -0800, Tim Johnson wrote:
>
> > ## This appears to be what works.
> > def __exec(self,args) :
> > """Run the process with arguments"""
> > p =
> > subprocess.Popen(args,stderr=subprocess.PIPE,stdout=subprocess.PIPE)
> > while 1 :
> > output = p.stdout.read()
>
> If the process tries to write more than a pipe's worth of data to stderr,
> before closing stdout, it will block indefinitely.
>
> If you want to process both stdout and stderr, you have to be able to
> consume the data in whatever order the process generates it, which means
> either using multiple threads or (on Unix) select/poll or non-blocking
> I/O. This is what the .communicate() method does (threads on Windows,
> select/poll on Unix).
>
> The alternative is to merge both streams with stderr=subprocess.STDOUT, or
> redirect one of them to a file (or /dev/null, etc).
In earlier code I, I was merging them...
:) Like I said: gnarly! What if I were to do something like:
## code
while 1:
output = p.stout.read()
err = p.stderr.read() ## trapping for AttributeError, etc..
....
## /code
break'ing if either no output or value in `err'
??
The objective is to display all output, but to also separate error
messages from normal output.
thank you
--
Tim
tim at tee jay forty nine dot com or akwebsoft dot com
http://www.akwebsoft.com
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
