"Tim Williams (gmail)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schreef in bericht news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Could you SMTP it back in ? It would gain an extra Received: header > but the rest of the email would most likely be unaltered.
I don't understand what you mean. How does this have to do with connecting to the (probably-not-running) IMAP service? > Not my area of expertise I'm afraid. If you manually run the script > then you could use getpass() to prompt you for the password at run > time. Not mine either.. ;) I'd like to avoid having the user type in a pw every time. Outlook doesn't seem to need that, so, unless that's unsafe, why should I? Or could I get xp to 'remember' it? Btw, Outlook does ask permission if you try to, say, read the body of message. Anyway, the approach I suggested earlier (pw encrypted using key) is probably unlikely to solve the security issue, either. I mean, if the key itself (or a reference to it) is in my code, then anyone reading that code can decrypt it, right? g -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
