On 07.10.2013 03:54, galeom...@gmail.com wrote:
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B2D69u2pweEvelh1T25ra19oZEU/edit?usp=sharing


For the readers who don't bother clicking on the link above: It's a short video where the OP demonstrates how her/his usage of tail doesn't work.

no matter call tail directly in python or using the script of tail
all failed
it seems it can not read next line

In your video you use gedit to write some file and "tail -f <file>" to follow it. But "tail -f" will follow the file descriptor. Usually, editors like gedit won't save your changes to the original file but create a new temporary file and rename it later to the original file name after deleting the original one. Thus tail will follow an already deleted file.
See also this blog post:
http://tech.shantanugoel.com/2009/12/23/continuous-monitor-tail-fails.html

For your example you will have to use "tail -F <file>" which will follow the file name.

Alternatively you could write a simple script to simulate a continously growing file like

import time
for i in range(1000):
    with open("test.txt", "a") as f:
        f.write(str(i) + '\n')
    time.sleep(1)

which should work with "tail -f".

Bye, Andreas
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Reply via email to