Op 03-11-13 06:17, Steven D'Aprano schreef: > On Sat, 02 Nov 2013 18:22:38 +0000, Joshua Landau wrote: > [...] >> Sure, you in all probability didn't mean it like that but rurpy isn't >> uncalled for in raising the concern. Really I just want to remind you >> that you're both on the same side here. > > Thanks for the comments Joshua, but I'm afraid I cannot agree. I gave it > a lot of thought and I cannot continue to give Rurpy the presumption of > good faith any longer. This saddens me, but that's the way it is. > > I'm trying hard to give up threads like this, where people debate the > subjective tone of an email and ever more pedantic arguments about the > precise wording. Even when all participants are arguing in good faith, > they risk becoming quagmires which go nowhere in dozens of posts.
I'm not so sure it is all in good faith. I see a lot of persons digging in their heels and not much effort in trying to understand someone else's point of view. -- Antoon Pardon -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
