On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 2:23 PM, Peter Cacioppi <peter.cacio...@gmail.com> wrote: > Ian said : > > " Whereas in Python, an attribute access is just > compiled as an attribute access no matter what the underlying > implementation of that access may end up being at run-time. " > > Really? Very nice. Have a good link handy for that? I'm compiling a codex of > "why py is better?".
Sorry, no, but this fact should be apparent as a consequence of Python's dynamicism. Since the compiler generally can't predict what the types of objects will be, the bytecode that it generates can't depend on those types. -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
