On Thu, 07 Nov 2013 18:25:18 -0800, jonas.thornvall wrote: > Please, you are he obnoxious, so fuck off
Pot, meet kettle. > I am not sure if it is just stupidness or laziness that prevent you from > seeing that 4^8=65536. And what is it that prevents you from seeing that 4**8=65536 is irrelevant to the compression of random data? All your talk about "reformulation of problems", "infinite number of arithmetical solutions" and "generic arithmetic encoding" is just a smoke screen to distract from the fact that you don't, in fact, have a compression algorithm that can losslessly compress arbitrary random data of any length. I am as sure as this as I am sure you don't have a perpetual motion machine, a method for squaring the circle using only a compass and straight-edge, or a fool-proof system for winning the lottery every week without any chance of failure. -- Steven -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list