On 11/9/2013 1:35 PM, Paul Rubin wrote:
This looks kind of interesting.
http://cs.brown.edu/~sk/Publications/Papers/Published/pmmwplck-python-full-monty/
Abstract
We present a small-step operational semantics for the Python programming
language. We present both a core language for Python, suitable for tools
and proofs, and a translation process for converting Python source to
this core. We have tested the composition of translation and evaluation
of the core for conformance with the primary Python implementa- tion,
thereby giving confidence in the fidelity of the seman- tics. We briefly
report on the engineering of these compo- nents. Finally, we examine
subtle aspects of the language, identifying scope as a pervasive concern
that even impacts features that might be considered orthogonal.
Thanks for posting this. I found it very interesting but will need more
time to digest it. I plan to open a separate thread based on one item in
the paper.
--
Terry Jan Reedy
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
