in 710625 20131119 091055 wxjmfa...@gmail.com wrote: >Le lundi 18 novembre 2013 14:31:33 UTC+1, Steven D'Aprano a =E9crit=A0: >> >> >> ... choose one of the three bad choices: ... >> >> >> >> * choose UTF-16 or UTF-8, and have O(n) primitive string operations (like= >=20 >> >> Haskell and, apparently, Ceylon); >> >> >> >> * or UTF-16 without support for the supplementary planes (which makes it= >=20 >> >> virtually UCS-2), like Javascript; >> >> >> >> * choose UTF-32, and use two or four times as much memory as needed. >> >> >> > >Nothing can beat the coding schemes endorsed by Unicode. > >They are all working on the smallest possible entity >level (Unicode Transformation *Units*) with a unique >set of these entities. > >To not forget.
Is that an egg-corn? -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
