On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 2:32 AM, Travis Griggs <travisgri...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Dec 5, 2013, at 2:56 AM, rusi <rustompm...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> 3. https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/python-virtualenv may be a better >> place to ask > > Am I the only one that sees the irony in this suggestion? Given the long > running tirades^H^H^H^H^H^H thread about “Managing Google Groups headaches”? > > “Pleassse don’t use Google Groupssssesss. It’sss nasssty. It hurtssess our > eyesssessss with itsss long linessssieesss. Unlessssss it hassss a ssspecial > neeeeed. Then the groupssesss are OK, Yessss?"
No, it's not like that. It's that there are some people who, despite truckloads of evidence to the contrary, still think that Google Groups is worth using. Rusi is one of them. Fortunately, he has defended his position by making his posts not look like the ridiculous junk that GG creates by default, but that doesn't make GG a good product. It's like an argument my boss and I had: I said that PHP is a bad language, and he said that it can't possibly be a bad language because he's able to write good code in it. I don't know what mailing list there is for virtualenv as I don't use it, but there's likely to be an alternative source of knowledge on it. ChrisA -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
