Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfr...@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > >> >>Well "performant" is performant enough for the purposes of communicating >>on the python list I think :D > > Most probably could figure it out as being stylistically similar to >"conformant", which I believe IS used in English <G> > >conformant => something that conforms >performant => something that performs
Yes, I suspect it comes from people expecting too much consistency. If something that has "conformance" is "conformant", then something that has good "performance" must be "performant". -- Tim Roberts, t...@probo.com Providenza & Boekelheide, Inc. -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
