In article <52c29782$0$29979$c3e8da3$54964...@news.astraweb.com>, Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info> wrote:
> Mark Lawrence wrote: > > > On 30/12/2013 21:56, Dan Stromberg wrote: > >> I keep hearing naysayers, nay saying about Python 3.x. > >> > >> Here's a 9 question, multiple choice survey I put together about > >> Python 2.x use vs Python 3.x use. > >> > >> I'd be very pleased if you could take 5 or 10 minutes to fill it out. > >> > >> Here's the URL: > >> https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/N5N5PG2 > >> > > > > People using 1.x will be miffed as their baby has been missed out :) > > You laugh, but there was at least one attendee at the last PyCon who was > still using 1.5 professionally. Software never quite dies so long as there > is hardware capable of running it. Oh, that's absurd. He should have at least upgraded to 1.6. -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
