Le mercredi 5 février 2014 16:23:01 UTC+1, Ned Batchelder a écrit : > On 2/5/14 9:41 AM, wxjmfa...@gmail.com wrote: > > > If you put the FSR on the table. > > > I think I have a very correct vision of what Unicode > > > should be and*is*. (*) > > > I belong to those who know that latin-1 is unusable for > > > more than ten European languages based on latin scripts. > > > Today, one can add German to these. > > > No offense, you are still stuck and living in > > > the ascii world. (The recent byte string discussion > > > was very informative on that subject). > > > > > > Writing that the FSR does not suit my needs seems to me > > > a little bit exagerated. You should have more concerns > > > about something like "ReportLab" than about my (jmf) software. > > > > > > (*) Luckily, that's already the case for the users using > > > serious tools. > > > > We've been over this too many times already, and we won't be discussing > > it with you again. > > > > -- > > Ned Batchelder, http://nedbatchelder.com
I agree. (but I was a little bit provocated) jmf -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
