Steven D'Aprano wrote: > On Wed, 13 Jul 2005 10:39:41 -0400, rbt wrote: [snip] > Ah, then that's easy. Sit down with pencil and paper, write out all 64 > combinations yourself, and then type them into a Python list. Then you can > access any one of those combinations with a single call. [snip] >>My list is not arbitrary. I'm looking for all 'combinations' as I >>originally posted. Order does not matter to me... just all possibilities. > > > That's good, since you only need combinations of "a", "b" and "c" the
"You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means." Both of you please google("define: combination") -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list