On Sat, 29 Mar 2014 13:45:12 +1100, Chris Angelico wrote: > Considering that we have ten fingers, having 1114112 keys would be quite > impractical. The smallest number of keys to render that many characters > would probably be 21, but it'd be toggling data into a computer, rather > than typing; *every* character would require holding down a good number > of keys. (Or you could go the other way and have exactly two keys: 1 and > 0. Press either 21 times to enter a single character.)
http://like-a-boss.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/supercoder.jpg -- Steven D'Aprano http://import-that.dreamwidth.org/ -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list