On Sunday, April 20, 2014 3:29:00 PM UTC+5:30, Steven D'Aprano wrote: > On Fri, 18 Apr 2014 23:40:18 -0700, Paul Rubin wrote: > > > It's just that the improvement > > from 2 to 3 is rather small, and 2 works perfectly well and people are > > used to it, so they keep using it. > > > Spoken like a true ASCII user :-)
Heh! > > The "killer feature" of Python 3 is improved handling of Unicode, which > now brings Python 3 firmly into the (very small) group of programming > languages with first-class support for more than 128 different characters > by default. As a unicode user (ok wannabe unicode user :D ) Ive written up some unicode ideas that have been discussed here in the last couple of weeks: http://blog.languager.org/2014/04/unicoded-python.html If Ive non or misattributed some ideas please excuse and let me know! -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list