On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 11:38 PM, Roy Smith <r...@panix.com> wrote:
> I'm trying to intuit, from the values I've been given, which coordinates
> are likely to be accurate to within a few miles. I'm willing to accept
> a few false negatives. If the number is float("38"), I'm willing to
> accept that it might actually be float("38.0000"), and I might be
> throwing out a good data point that I don't need to.
You have one chance in ten, repeatably, of losing a digit. That is,
roughly 10% of your four-decimal figures will appear to be
three-decimal, and 1% of them will appear to be two-decimal, and so
on. Is that "a few" false negatives? It feels like a lot IMO. But
then, there's no alternative - the information's already gone.
ChrisA
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
