On Wednesday, July 9, 2014 2:47:40 PM UTC+5:30, Steven D'Aprano wrote: > On Wed, 09 Jul 2014 17:21:20 +1000, Chris Angelico wrote:
> > wrote: > >> Thoughts? Comments? > > First thought: It will just add confusion. Currently, there are small > > pockets of confusion surrounding the few cases where something's > > non-reflexive, and there are occasional threads on the subject, like we > > have now. > It's a reoccurring issue that keeps coming up over and over again. Most > people have no need of NANs, and want them to behave like "normal" > objects. I'm sympathetic to this idea. -nan from me And since you count nans as normal, I am sure you can work out how much that amounts to <wink> -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
