In article <mailman.12580.1407068955.18130.python-l...@python.org>, Mark Lawrence <breamore...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> On 02/08/2014 20:58, Ben Finney wrote: > > Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info> writes: > > > >> If you need instances which carry state, then object is the wrong > >> class. > > > > Right. The âtypesâ module provides a SimpleNamespace class for the > > common âbag of attributesâ use case:: > > > > >>> import types > > >>> foo = types.SimpleNamespace() > > >>> foo.x = 3 > > >>> foo > > namespace(x=3) > > > > <URL:https://docs.python.org/3/library/types.html#types.SimpleNamespace> > > > > What Alex Martelli called a bunch? > > http://code.activestate.com/recipes/52308-the-simple-but-handy-collector-of-a- > bunch-of-named/ Still overkill :-) I usually just do: class Data: pass my_obj = Data() That's all you really need. It's annoying that you can't just do: my_obj = object() which would be even simpler, because (for reasons I don't understand), you can't create new attributes on my_obj.
-- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list