On Tue, 05 Aug 2014 12:39:18 -0700, Christian Calderon wrote:
> I have been using python for 4 years now, and I just started learning
> ruby.
> I like that in ruby I don't have to type parenthesis at the end of each
> function call if I don't need to provide extra arguments. I just
> realized right now that I can do something similar in python, if I make
> all methods with only the implicitly passed 'self' into properties.
> Which means I can either do some fancy coding and make a metaclass that
> does this auto-magically, or I have to have property decorators all over
> the place :-P . I was wondering what other thought of this, is it an
> overly fanciful way of coding python, or is it an acceptable thing to do
> in a real project?
> Also, would anyone be interested in helping me make this metaclass?
> <div dir="ltr">I have been using python for 4 years now, and I just
> started learning ruby. I like that in ruby I don't have to type
> parenthesis at the end of each function call if I don't need to
> provide extra arguments. I just realized right now that I can do
> something similar in python, if I make all methods with only the
> implicitly passed 'self' into properties. Which means I can
> either do some fancy coding and make a metaclass that does this
> auto-magically, or I have to have property decorators all over the place
> :-P . I was wondering what other thought of this, is it an overly
> fanciful way of coding python, or is it an acceptable thing to do in a
> real project? Also, would anyone be interested in helping me make this
> metaclass?</div>
import this
Special Cases are not special enough
This is a horrible idea for python code
--
Once is happenstance,
Twice is coincidence,
Three times is enemy action.
-- Auric Goldfinger
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
