On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 9:20 PM, Ned Batchelder <n...@nedbatchelder.com> wrote: > On 8/8/14 5:42 AM, Paul Wolf wrote: >> >> On Friday, 8 August 2014 10:22:33 UTC+1, Chris Angelico wrote: >>> >>> But I eyeballed your code, and I'm seeing a lot of >>> u'string' prefixes, which aren't supported on 3.0-3.2 (they were >>> reinstated in 3.3 as per PEP 414), so a more likely version set would >>> >>> be 2.6+, 3.3+. What's the actual version support? >>> ChrisA >> >> >> I'm going to have to assume you are right that I only tested on 3.3, >> skipping > 2.7 and < 3.3. I'll create an issue for that. >> > > Don't bother trying to support <=3.2. It will be far more difficult than it > is worth in terms of adoption of the library.
Agreed. I would be looking at the solution here being "test on 3.4, then (assuming no problems) declare that it works on 3.3+". Anyone on Debian Wheezy can spin up a Python 3 from source anyway, and presumably ditto for any other Linux distro that's distributing 3.1 or 3.2; most other platforms should have a more modern Python available one way or another. ChrisA -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list