Peter Pearson <ppearson@nowhere.invalid>: > MK Shen used to hang out on the sci.crypt newsgroup, so we're probably > talking "cryptographically large" rather than "engineeringly large".
I'm thinking we're talking about philosophically large. Those kinds of numbers are unwieldy from all angles, including cryptography. Marko -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
