Rustom Mody <rustompm...@gmail.com>: > OP asks for 'is' (Haskell has no equivalent of 'is') > > Almost all the answers explain why its a bad idea
Well, I don't think it is a bad idea in and of itself, but if you don't have it, you don't have to define it. Object identity does make you look under the skin. In Python, it is necessary even without id() or *is* since you have to understand why >>> a = [] >>> b = a >>> b.append(0) >>> a [0] Exposing object identity is a consequence of allowing mutable objects. Marko -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
