On Friday, October 3, 2014 5:41:12 AM UTC+5:30, Steven D'Aprano wrote: > [Rustom] > > Right and the OP subject as well as post are essentially that conflation: > [allegedly Steven] > >> Any idea why 'None' is getting passed even though calling the donuts(4) > >> alone returns the expected value?
> I didn't write that. I don't know who you are quoting, but it isn't me. Are you for real Steven?? Ok so there is no conventional attribution line because it was cut-pasted from elsewhere in the thread but there is a clear and unequivocal prefix of "OP subject as well as post". Why/how should there be any ambiguity that that is Shiva?? Since you are merrily throwing around mis-attribution charges please explain the logic by which "Steven" == "OP" Or are not aware OP means 'original post(er)'? Likewise all the below '[allegedly Steven]s'... > [Rustom] > > And further if you consider that the explanations have aided, here's the > > most recent 'conclusion': > [allegedly Steven] > >> * return 'Number of donuts: ',count returns a tuple like: > >> ('Number of donuts: ',9) > And again, despite you attributing this to me, I did not write that. > [allegedly Steven] > >> * To just print the string without returning it as tuple , use string > >> formatting. > [Rustom] > > You find this understanding satisfactory?? > And that's the third time in one post that you have attributed something > written by somebody else to me. > Rustom, I don't consider this blatant misattribution of other people's words > to me is acceptable behaviour. And what kind of conversation is it if I ask you > > You find this understanding satisfactory?? as a question ABOUT you? How you are able to confuse a question addressed TO you into a question ABOUT you is beyond me. Did you run out of your morning coffee or somethin? -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list