On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 5:09 AM, Marko Rauhamaa <ma...@pacujo.net> wrote: > Sure it could by having an invisible background thread occasionally call > time.monotonic(). It could even be done on the side without a thread.
No, it can't be solved by anything in that process, because... > * the program could be stopped by a STOP signal ... what you said There's no way to guarantee to keep calling the function. You have to depend on upstream. ChrisA -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
