On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 9:10 AM, Wolfgang Maier <wolfgang.ma...@biologie.uni-freiburg.de> wrote: > which I read as there has been a stepwise transition between 2.5 and 2.7 so > that 2.7 now behaves like Python 3 even without the __future__ statement. > OTOH, I believe you, of course, if you're saying implicit relative imports > are working just fine in 2.7, but then how to interpret the "In Python 2.7 > the __future__ statement is not needed." above ?
Hmm. To be honest, I'm not sure. The Python 2.7 __future__ module claims that absolute_import became standard in 3.0, not 2.7, which seems to conflict with what you're seeing. ChrisA -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list