On Saturday, December 6, 2014 3:30:56 PM UTC-5, Albert-Jan Roskam wrote: > ---------------------------- > On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 8:54 PM CET Mark Lawrence wrote: > > >For those who haven't heard thought this might be of interest > >https://github.com/fijal/jitpy > > Interesting, but it is not clear to me when you would use jitpy instead of > pypy. Too bad pypy alone was not included in the benchmarks (cython would > have also been nice).
There are plenty of situations. For example, I am building an app that requires access to modules that don't currently work under pypy. With this tool I could still take advantage of pypy JIT, but use CPython for other stuff. -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
