On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 6:46 PM, Mark Lawrence <breamore...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > On 20/01/2015 00:49, Dan Stromberg wrote: >> >> On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 2:06 PM, Zachary Gilmartin >> <zacharygilmar...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Why aren't there trees in the python standard library? >> >> >> Trees are kind of specialized datastructures; no one type of tree >> solves all tree-related problems suitably well. >> >> I think probably the most common need for a tree is implementing a >> cache, but most times you're tempted to sort inside a loop you're >> better off with a tree. >> >> I've put some time into python trees; most of them are on pypi and at: >> http://stromberg.dnsalias.org/~dstromberg/datastructures/ >> and: >> http://stromberg.dnsalias.org/~strombrg/python-tree-and-heap-comparison/ >> >> HTH >> > > I don't know if you've seen this http://kmike.ru/python-data-structures/ but > maybe of interest.
I've seen it. It's a nice page. I attempted to get my treap port in there since it has a Cython version, but it didn't seem to take. I've mostly focused on pure python that runs on CPython 2.x, CPython 3.x, Pypy, Pypy3 and Jython. -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list