In article <d34dbfbe-fe82-47dc-8bc3-c8773e2b7...@googlegroups.com>, rustompm...@gmail.com says... > > Yeah python has trees alright. > > Heres' some simple tree-code
Didn't you just demonstrate that Python has no trees and instead you have to implement them yourself (or use a third-party implementation)? I don't know what's the point of all this vain and misleading play with words. Not only most languages don't implement trees in their standard libraries (its no shame, it's no sin), but also it's quite evident that there's a big difference between implementing a data structure yourself through the application of language facilities and seeing that data structure already implemented for you in the standard library. -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list