On 3/15/15, Mark Lawrence <breamore...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > On 15/03/2015 19:05, John Nagle wrote: >> On 3/14/2015 1:00 AM, Marko Rauhamaa wrote: >>> John Nagle <na...@animats.com>: >>>> I'm approaching the end of converting a large system from Python 2 >>>> to Python 3. Here's why you don't want to do this. >>> >>> A nice report, thanks. Shows that the slowness of Python 3 adoption is >>> not only social inertia. >>> Marko >> >> Thanks. >> >> Some of the bugs I listed are so easy to hit that I suspect those >> packages aren't used much. Those bugs should have been found years >> ago. Fixed, even. I shouldn't be discovering them in 2015. >> >> I appreciate all the effort put in by developers in fixing these >> problems. Python 3 is still a long way from being ready for prime >> time, though. >> >> John Nagle >> > > This https://python3wos.appspot.com/ says differently.
A "package supporting python 3" is not equivalent to a "package not introducing new bugs in its python 3 version relative to python 2" and is also not equivalent to a "package working without issues on python 3". Cheers, Daniel -- Psss, psss, put it down! - http://www.cafepress.com/putitdown -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list