Cameron Simpson <c...@zip.com.au> writes:
> This passes the local variables inside test1() to "condition" as a
> single parameter. Now, I grant that vars['i'] is a miracle of
> tediousness. So consider this elaboration:
>
> from collections import namedtuple
>
> condition_test = lambda vars: vars.i + vars.j > 4
>
> def test1(a, b, condition):
> for i, j in zip(a,b):
> c = i + j
> vars = locals()
> varnames = list(vars.keys())
> varstupletype = namedtuple("locals", varnames)
> varstuple = varstupletype(*[ vars[k] for k in varnames ])
> if condition(varstuple):
> print("Foo")
>
> Here, the condition_test function/lambda uses "vars.i" and "vars.j",
> which i think you'll agree is easier to read and write. The price is
> the construction of a "namedtuple" to hold the variable name
> values. See:
>
> https://docs.python.org/3/library/collections.html#collections.namedtuple
>
This is probably getting off topic, but is there any relevant difference
or benefit to using namedtuple instead of something like types.SimpleNamespace?
https://docs.python.org/3/library/types.html#additional-utility-classes-and-functions
--
A hundred men did the rational thing. The sum of those rational choices was
called panic. Neal Stephenson -- System of the world
http://www.graune.org/GnuPG_pubkey.asc
Key fingerprint = 1E44 9CBD DEE4 9E07 5E0A 5828 5476 7E92 2DB4 3C99
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
