On Mon, 30 Mar 2015 15:47:23 +1100, Chris Angelico wrote: > On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 3:35 PM, Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> > wrote: >> 2b. John, thank you for describing your experience and making the >> community's picture of the current overall state of Python 3 more >> accurate. It was apparently a bit too rosy before, and we should avoid >> fostering unrealistic expectations in the future.
> Not without some evidence of where this "a bit too rosy" picture came > from. So far, we've had rebuttals of vaguenesses, which pretty much > amount to FUD. I went and looked earlier - the HOWTO on the Python 3 documentation site <https://docs.python.org/3.4/howto/webservers.html> appears to be almost a straight copy of the HOWTO from the Python 2 documentation. <https:// docs.python.org/2/howto/webservers.html> As such, it should either be updated to ensure that any external libraries and modules are Python 3 compatible, have a suitable caveat inserted, or be removed. -- Denis McMahon, denismfmcma...@gmail.com -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list