On 02/05/2015 20:15, Mark Lawrence wrote:
On 02/05/2015 19:34, BartC wrote:
OK, so it's the programmer's fault if as fundamental a concept as a for-loop ranging over integers is implemented inefficiently. He has to transform it into high-level terms, or has to reconstruct it somehow using a while-loop and an incrementing loop index.
I give up.
So do I, I think, if no-one is willing to admit that the original way of implementing range() was a glaring mistake.
-- Bartc -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
