On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 11:01 PM, Steven D'Aprano <st...@pearwood.info> wrote: > I'm not saying that it is impossible to have a correct Unicode implemention > using UTF-16, but I've never seen one.
I suspect this is partly because, if you're aiming for correct Unicode semantics, UTF-8 offers everything that UTF-16 does and more. The only reason to use UTF-16 is so you can pretend that UCS-2 is good enough. ChrisA -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
