Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid>: > On 2015-06-02, Ian Kelly <ian.g.ke...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Accepting for the sake of argument that "something to be subclassed" >> is a reasonable definition of object, > > Huh? You can't subclass an object. You can subclass a Class.
More to the point: you don't need classes for objects -- even in the deepest OOP sense. In Python, classes are little more than constructor functions. Marko -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
