On Sat, 30 Jul 2005 08:14:16 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (phil hunt) wrote:
>On Fri, 29 Jul 2005 06:37:52 GMT, Bengt Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>I suggested in a previous thread that one could support such a syntax by
>>supporting an invisible binary operator between two expressions,
>
>That's a truely appalling idea.
>
>>so that
>>examine "string" translates to examine.__invisbinop__("string") if
>>examine as an expression evaluates to an object that has a __invisbinop__
>>method.
>>
>>Then you wouldn't define examine as a function, you would define it as an
>>instance
>>of a class like
>> class Examine(object):
>> define __invisbinop__(self, other):
>> #...whatever
>> examine = Examine()
>>and then
>> examine "string"
>
>Pass the sick bucket.
>
LOL ;-)
Regards,
Bengt Richter
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
