On 08.06.2015 09:22, jbauer.use...@gmail.com wrote: > Something that I could always use as a workaround would be to open up a > listening port locally in one thread and connection to that local port in a > different thread, then forward packets. But that's pretty ugly and I'd like > to avoid it.
Didn't actually have to do that. My solution now is to use socket.socketpair() and forward traffic from there. Works reasonably well and isn't racy (unlike opening up a local TCP/IP port would be). So I think this solves the problem (although it'd still be cool to have an alternative way of specifying a send/recv function IMHO). Cheers, Johannes -- >> Wo hattest Du das Beben nochmal GENAU vorhergesagt? > Zumindest nicht öffentlich! Ah, der neueste und bis heute genialste Streich unsere großen Kosmologen: Die Geheim-Vorhersage. - Karl Kaos über Rüdiger Thomas in dsa <hidbv3$om2$1...@speranza.aioe.org> -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
