Robert Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Lenny G. wrote: >> Is there a way to make a c/c++ extension have a useful method >> signature? Right now, help(myCFunc) shows up like: >> myCFunc(...) >> description of myCFunc >> I'd like to be able to see: >> myCFunc(myArg1, myArg2) >> description of myCFunc >> Is this currently possible? > > There really isn't a way to let the inspect module know about > extension function arguments. Just put it in the docstring. >
The next release of boost.python should do this automatically: (http://mail.python.org/pipermail/c++-sig/2005-July/009243.html) >>> help(rational.lcm) Help on built-in function lcm: lcm(...) C++ signature: lcm(int, int) -> int >>> help(rational.int().numerator) Help on method numerator: numerator(...) method of boost_rational_ext.int instance C++ signature: numerator(boost::rational<int> {lvalue}) -> int Regards, Phil -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
