Ian Kelly <ian.g.ke...@gmail.com> writes: > On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 4:56 PM, Ian Kelly <ian.g.ke...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 4:39 PM, <jonas.thornv...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> http://jt.node365.se/baseconversion8.html <snip> > By the way, I think you have a bug. I did my time testing by > concatenating the default input number to itself several times. At > 5184 decimal digits, which was the last case I tried, the 58th output > digit was 1111111, after which point the remaining 672 output digits > are all 12665464, which seemed rather improbable.
Yes, it's a bug. Because it's off-topic, I won't say more here but I posted a simpler test case to comp.lang.javacript just now (10000000 converted to base 100). I would not normally reply here, but I wanted to acknowledge your post as prompting me to look for other cases. Followup-to: set. -- Ben. -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
